Anzi, tutti i commentatori, Rush Limbaugh in testa, stanno gridando al tradimento dei principi fondamentali della destra americana: individualismo, responsabilità personale, nessun intervento della cosa pubblica nel mondo degli affari, poche tasse, nessuna forma di assistenzialismo. Un bell’articolo della Reuters da Atlanta spiega la strana situazione che si è venuta creare, con un blocco di emittenti schierate contro una proposta di legge che dopotutto viene da un presidente dello stesso blocco. Ma ormai Bush non viene più considerato abbastanza repubblicano, gli stessi dubbi che attenuano da sempre la volontà di sostenere il candidato McCain.
Naturalmente, ce n’è anche per i democratici, accusati adesso di voler cavalcare il piano di salvataggio per creare divisioni nello schieramento avversario. E ai democratici, al pari dei repubblicani, viene data la colpa dell’attuale situazione economica.
E’ un bel dilemma per gli elettori repubblicani, approvare il piano di Bush equivale a smentire una posizione fortemente contraria all’interventismo e alienarsi una parte di consensi da destra. Ma non accettarlo, significa saltare nel buio di una congiuntura che potrebbe pesare notevolmente sulle prossime presidenziali, spingendo una cospicua parte dei voti verso Obama. E’ molto interessante vedere che in questo complicato dibattito stanno entrando a gamba tesa i conduttori di talk show radiofonici che influiscono profondamente su milioni di persone. Ascoltatori che abitano in stati in genere poco ricchi, che appartengono a gruppi demografici poco abbienti, che hanno pochi titoli di studio. Insomma, gente che dalla crisi economica rischia di essere colpita parecchio. In gioco, se ci pensate bene, c’è anche il consenso riservato a Limbaugh e compagnia cantando, i savonarola di una politica becera e piena di pregiudizi che tuttavia ripaga profutamente i suoi accesi predicatori. Rush Limbaugh guadagna un sacco di soldi con le sue quotidiane dosi di odio radiofonico. Che ne sarà di quel denaro se il vento dovesse cambiare e una parte di ascoltatori delusi dovesse voltargli le spalle?
Conservative talk radio rails against bailout
Fri Sep 26, 2008
By Matthew Bigg
ATLANTA (Reuters) – Opposition to a massive Wall Street bailout plan has quickly emerged on conservative talk radio, with hosts and callers saying the rescue undermines principles at the heart of the Republican Party.
Tens of millions of conservatives tune in to AM talk radio, trusting nationally syndicated hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Neal Boortz over media outlets they say have a liberal bias.
“I really don’t like this (proposal),” said Lance from North Carolina on the “Today’s Issues” program broadcast on Christian radio stations across America.
“This nation was … built on individualism as far as profit and responsibility. And with us bailing these banks out we’re … saying any time you get into trouble we’re going to come bail you out,” he said on Friday, in a view echoed by callers on several shows.
President George W. Bush has urged swift passage of the $700 billion measure. But talks in Congress have stalled on the opposition of conservative Republicans, and both parties appear wary of fully backing a measure that could prove an electoral liability.
“If this (plan) was so good, they (Democrats) should pass it. They should brag about it. They should take credit for it. But the Democrats understand that this bill is dirty,” said Limbaugh, the most popular of the talk show hosts.
Democrats are aiming to use talks over the rescue plan to get Republicans to repudiate their principles and reject their grass-roots supporters, Limbaugh said.
CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES
Talk radio in the United States features long monologues by the host and calls from listeners that often reinforce the host’s opinion.
Several conservative talk show hosts argue that they are engaged in a long struggle to return the Republican Party to its guiding ideology of small government, low taxes and strong national defense.
Some view Republican candidate John McCain as an unreliable conservative who has made too many compromises with Democrats on crucial issues such as immigration reform and campaign finance.
Boortz, who calls himself a libertarian, said both parties were to blame for the financial crisis that started in the housing market by encouraging banks to make bad loans.
But he said Democrats now want to turn the bailout plan into a “financial Christmas tree” with goodies for left-wing community groups that could help them during November’s election.
“This situation (on Wall Street) does not arise without government participation. It is not the excesses of the free market alone. It is excesses of the free market that are enabled and supported by government action,” said Boortz, whose program’s slogan is “The Truth Shall Make You Mad.”
GINGRICH SPEAKS OUT
Conservative icon and former House of Representatives Speaker Newt Gingrich told Boortz the plan was a bad idea made worse by the intervention of liberal Democrats who wished to add provisions that would enrich lawyers and further weaken the economy.
Thankfully, conservative Republicans had put a stop to it, said Gingrich.
The plan puts conservatives in a bind, and that it was proposed by a Republican president further blurs distinctions, said Alan Abramowitz, a professor of political science at Emory University in Atlanta.
Either they swallow it, violating free market principles they hold dear, or they oppose it and risk seeing confidence in the free market system evaporate.
“This is an ideological problem. If you are conservative and you believe in small government and the free market, if you fail that’s your problem. That’s the way the market is supposed to work,” he said.
